Cost of living in Japan (and elsewhere)

Published: Apr 24, 2014 by Joe Larabell

I’ve just discovered a web site called Numbeo (http://www.numbeo.com). It was created by a guy who used to work for Google Ireland. The idea is to have regular people from around the world submit prices in their areas for certain common commodities and services and to use the results to compare the cost-of-living among various cities. Since I am often asked what it costs to live in Tokyo, I’ve bookmarked this page as my new standard answer.

I compared Tokyo to San Francisco and learned that housing prices here (Tokyo) are significantly lower than over there. That wasn’t a surprise to me – I’m in the tech industry and I have a lot of friends who live in and around that area and I know what’s been happening recently. But there are still many people who assume that Tokyo is one of the most expensive places to live in the world. Of course, whether any particular person would find living here “expensive” depends a lot on where they were living before. Someone from New York City, London, Sydney, or San Francisco wouldn’t find it all that expensive (those are all cities which Numbeo classifies as on-par or more expensive than Tokyo. Someone coming from Wichita, Kansas, on the other hand, might be astounded to find that rents in Tokyo are more than double what they’re used to back home.

Another thing that fuels common belief is stories told by tourists and authors of travel books. Most people in that category stay in high-class hotels, eat at the hotel restaurants (because they don’t know where else to go), shop in boutiques, and entertain themselves by going to Disneyland or Universal Studios (two of the champions of high-price attractions). The general opinion they convey about Tokyo, and about Japan in general, is that it’s an expensive place to visit. Probably so… but so is New York City or London if you only follow the tourist path. Regular people don’t eat in hotel restaurants unless they’re out on a date and trying to impress their partner.

Overall, Tokyo isn’t any more expensive than most other large cities. If you buy commodities at the grocery store and eat in small local shops when you eat out, it’s not all that bad. If possible, live outside the city center to save as much as 50% on rent (it doesn’t have to be all that far, either). Rents are on-par with major US cities but the space you get for your money is smaller. But, then again, unless you bring a houseful of US-size furniture, you soon get used to the difference (this is where people from the UK might have an advantage – my experience is that UK housing and furniture is much smaller than the US equivalent).

The one thing that did stick out in the numbers was energy cost. That kinds makes sense. Whatever Japan can’t generate itself has to be imported. Since 2011, most of the nuclear plants have been closed down and Japan is importing coal to power the annoyingly noisy Pachinko parlors and other large neon signs. So the electric bill is bound to be a bit of a shock at first (pun intended). Taxes, in my case, are slightly lower (coming from California, which has a significant State Income Tax). Health insurance is slightly higher. Public transportation costs more but not if you factor in the savings from not owning a car (driving in Tokyo is more of a hassle than a convenience – the same can’t be said if you happen to live in the boonies).

Coming back to the subject of Numbeo for a second… the site seems destined for fame because it’s both easy-to-use and, in those cases where I have some personal experience, it seems to be fairly accurate. There is some risk in the crowd-sourcing model but the creator of the site acknowledges that in one of his blog posts (which in itself is interesting if you happen to like talking about numbers). Given enough time and data to tweak the model, and given enough interest on the part of the people who gather and input new data, this should prove to be one of the more useful applications of crowd sourcing. After all, who better to tell you what things cost in a given city than someone who actually lives there?

This post was originally published as: https://larabell.org/wordpress/cost-of-living-in-japan-and-elsewhere/

Comments:

The Disqus comments section is currently under evaluation. You should not have to be logged in to post a comment. If you have any trouble or see anything strange in this section, please let me know. Thanks.

It’s funny how, every once in a while, if you listen to the subtle messages unfolding around you on a constant basis, you pick up on a pattern of small bits of information that seem to build into something substantial. That happened to me recently on the general topic of effortlessness. Like many would-be adepts, I have a number of daily practices that I fit into various parts of the day. Sometimes they pay off with feelings of increased awareness or energy but, if I were being totally honest, most of the time they feel like drudge-work… a part of the day that occurs more out of habit than anything else… with the basic idea being one of consistency rather than joy.

I was listening to the latest Sam Harris podcast today and ran across an interesting take on something that should be familiar to most Western Ceremonial Magicians. Eric Weinstein was talking about finding meaning in license plate numbers as he drives around (don’t we all do that when we first start on the Path?) and the way he explained it was:

"...it's important to notice what it feels like to discern meaning where there is no meaning... it's important to get in touch with the "as if madness" experience in order to guard against madness; so I'm hoping to suspend my insistence on Truth for periods of time..."

I’m not sure about the connection with madness, per-se… and I’m wondering if that wasn’t just a ploy designed to wrap up the thought before getting interrupted. I realized when he said that that another good reason for discerning meaning where there is none is to prevent intellectual ossification (my term… it didn’t appear in the podcast, as far as I know). The belief that one particular way of looking at things must serve as the filter through which we see everything else from that point forward seems to be common in most philosophies and pretty much all religions. Adherence to a strict theology makes us less able to evaluate contrary ideas on their own merit. On the other hand, by constantly playing fast and loose with one’s synaptic network, so to speak, one might stand a chance of maintaining enough mental flexibility to recognize a true Epiphany when it finally does come.

It’s ironic that avoiding intellectual ossification was one of the main points that Sam was trying to convey just moments earlier… that there’s no logical reason to use one or more points-of-view which happen to have been elaborated thousands of years ago over new points-of-view developed by one’s own reason in the present time. Of course, that’s easier said than done and when most people start on any sort of Philosophical or Spiritual Path, they’re usually not capable of the kind of deep reasoning that would discern the “true meaning” of the Universe at first glance… so we may need to use ancient philosophy and religion as a crutch for a while… in order to bootstrap our thinking to the point where we can reason with some depth on the Universe and our purpose within it. But I expect that we all have to eventually drop the rhetoric and design our own systems based on First Principles.

I was listening to an interview with the authors of the new book The Distracted Mind on NPR this morning and they touched on a favorite pet peeve of mine that centers on a basic misunderstanding of the term multitasking. According to Wikipedia, the first published use of the term “multitask” appeared in an IBM paper describing the capabilities of the IBM System/360 in 1965. Is is only recently that the term has been used in the common vernacular to refer to the apparent ability of humans to “concentrate” on more than one task at a time.